We hold that the
wicked hike in school fee and closure of the university has further shown the characteristic
insensitivity of the management to the plight of students who are trying to make
up 6 months lost to ASUU strike last year! This is indeed especially callous given
the fact that Uniport has benefited from increased funding the ASUU strike won for
universities. The ASUU strike was protracted as a result of the refusal of the
government to implement the agreement he had signed with the union.
We also condemn the falsehood
invented by the management that the students who protested against the increment
were not students of Uniport. This was also stated as the reason for the
closure of the university as the protest was very peaceful except for the teargasing
of students and violent repression of the protest by the police called in by management.
The blame for this
unfortunate situation must be squarely placed on the head of the rotten NANS
Zone B and students’ union leadership whose opportunism and treachery after
being allegedly bribed by the Vice Chancellor Professor Joseph Ajienka took side
with management and refused to support and lead students in protest against the
fee hike
Unfortunately, the closure of the university on the 11th of June came as students were planning further actions to press home their demands of total reversal having not satisfied with management's meager concession.
We consider the
haste at which the University senate closed the institution on the request of
the Vice Chancellor as an abuse of the senate powers and a sinister move meant
to punish students for daring to protest management anti-poor policies.
Otherwise a reasonable University management would find all possible means to
negotiate with students with a view to meeting their legitimate demands. It is
only in an undemocratic setting where the NANS and SUG leadership are imposed
on students that the school management would assume that students who protested
against its wicked anti-poor policies are not its students and on that pretence
decided to shut down the university.
This is essentially one
of the reasons the ERC very often argues for genuine, independent students’ unionism
and for the involvement of elected representatives of staffs, both teaching and
non-teaching, and students in all decision
making organs of the university.
Lexan Ali
Education Rights
Campaign (ERC), University of Port Harcourt.
No comments:
Post a Comment