Friday, 19 April 2013

RECALL ERC and DSM MEMBER MICHAEL OGUNDELE NOW!


END VICTIMIZATION OF STUDENT ACTIVISTS!!
Call for Protest Letters and Solidarity

By Abbey Trotsky

Michael Ogundele victimised by UI management

The Management of the University of Ibadan (UI) has continued its notoriety of victimizing student activists who lead students to challenge its highhandedness and demand improvement in welfare condition. The latest attack is the recent rustication for one academic session of a student activist, Comrade Michael Ogundele. Michael, who is the Secretary of University of Ibadan branch of the Democratic Socialist Movement (DSM) and leading member of Education Rights Campaign (ERC), was victimized on the basis of a false allegation.

This rustication is part of politically-motivated plan to attack the DSM and its members for mobilizing and leading students in struggle against management's anti-poor, neo-liberal education policies.
We therefore call on organizations and individuals including trade unions, human rights groups, staff unions in universities, students unions, youth groups, activists and socialists, locally and internationally, to demand end to the brutal attack on student activists in University of Ibadan, and immediate and unconditional recall of Michael Ogundele. 

It all started on January 7, 2013, when Comrade Michael was given a query letter over an allegation of misconduct to the effect that he was found in Tedder Hall, one of the halls of residence within the university, on January 2 in "defiance" of the university directive that all students must vacate all halls of residence on or before December 24, 2012.

It is instructive to state that the query was issued exactly a week after a massive and spontaneous student protest in which members of DSM, including comrade Michael, played a leading role and which forced the University management to retract some of its anti-student policies like hike in accommodation fees.
However, in both his response to the query letter and physical appearance at the panel constituted by the school management, Comrade Michael pleaded not guilty to the allegation of misconduct. As a matter of fact, Comrade Michael was on Industrial Training (IT) from December 12, 2012 to January 12, 2013 when theuniversity actually opened for the new academic calendar. It was within the period of this IT that the university management gave the directive that all students should vacate the hall of residence on or before December 24, 2012 while those on IT should register for a temporary accommodation. 

In compliance with this directive, Michael was among the first few set of IT students who on December 6, 2012, actually registered for a temporary accommodation with the Industrial Training Coordinating Centre (ITCC) as directed. This was with an expectation that the application would be processed with an immediate allocation of temporary accommodation to all registered IT students before December 24, 2012, the deadline the University management set for all students to vacate the halls of residence. 
 
Given the fact that the motive behind forcing students out of the hall of residence by the school management was just to perfect the strategies and tactics to impose the hiked accommodation fees and other anti-students policies like prohibition of cooking in halls on students upon resumption, the question of immediate provision of alternative accommodation for those who were compelled to stay behind on campus for one academic purpose or another was not on the priority list of the university management.

This explains why up till late hours of January 2, 2013, no allocation for temporary accommodation was assigned. It is this unwarranted delay in the processing of the application for the temporary accommodation due to the negligence on the part of the university management that created the condition why many students upon their return to campus on January 2, 2013 after the yuletide break fell victims to a lack of place to lay their head.

In the midst of all this situation, Comrade Michael was able to meet a student with a similar problem who offered him a temporary place to stay in his uncle's place off-campus pending the time all issues connected with the temporary accommodation would be resolved. With the temporary accommodation, Michael, decided to go to his former room to move out his luggage, without any intention whatsoever, to continue to stay in the room. In less than three minutes in the room, he was accosted, arrested and detained for almost 15 hours at the university security post.

Comrade Michael was able to prove that the negligence on the side of the university management to allocate temporary accommodation to all registered IT students before December 24, 2012- the deadline set for all students to vacate the halls of residence - was the cause of his presence in the said room. Hence, the university management had to cook-up another false allegation to justify their original plan which is the victimization of Michael for his leading role in the struggle of students.

The university management on March 26, 2013, over a month after he had appeared before Central Students Disciplinary Committee (CSDC), handed him a letter of rustication from the university dated February 28, 2013. Curiously, the first paragraph of the reads, "the Central Student Disciplinary Committee at the meeting held on Wednesday, 27 February, 2013, considered the allegation of Examination Misconduct leveled against you to the effect that you were found in Tedder Hall on Wednesday, January 2, 2013, about 21.50hours, in defiance of the directive of the University Management that all students must vacate the halls of residence latest by 6.00pm on Monday 24th December, 2012."

Taking a look at the above-stated allegation, there are a lot of discrepancies and contradictions between the query letter dated January 7 2013 and the letter of rustication dated February 28 2013 upon which the decision of the committee was predicated.

First of all, there was never a time Michael was alleged of examination misconduct. As a matter of fact, the title of the query letter issued to him on January 7, 2013 was Allegation of Gross Misconduct, not Examination Misconduct. How the committee suddenly changed this original allegation to Examination Misconduct is quite surprising.

Again, how the claim of "illegal" presence in Tedder Hall on the above-stated day became examination misconduct is quite baffling, more so that no examination was taking place in the hall of residence on that date. 

According to (1b), page 50 of Student Information Handbook for 2008/2009 session (28) different offences classified as Examination Misconduct and their respective sanctions are clearly outlined. Interestingly, none of these is "illegal presence of students in the hall of residence at any stipulated time".
In the same Student information handbook, the procedure for handling cases of examination misconduct is also described in (1a) on page 50 as a process emanating from the Faculty to the CSDC for the final determination.

As a 300L student of department of Zoology, Faculty of science, there has never been any time Michael received any letter of invitation to face any disciplinary committee at either department or faculty level in any case related to examination misconduct.

But these contradictions are not surprising or accidental. As we have pointed the entire purpose is to attack Michael and thereby hit the DSM for our political role in students' struggles.

In line with the last paragraph of the letter of rustication, which stipulates the right to appeal through the Registrar to the University Governing Council within (14) days of receipt of the letter in case of dissatisfaction with the decision of the committee, Comrade Michael has already appealed the decision of the committee where he called for the reversal of the decision with immediate restoration of his studentship.

We therefore call for protest letters, locally and internationally, to the management through the e-mail addresses below demanding the immediate and unconditional recall of Michael Ogundele, and an end to victimization of student activists and attack on democratic rights. Phone calls and text messages can also be sent to the phone numbers.

Office of Registrar
University of Ibadan
Phone: (+234) (2) 8750260, (+234) (2) 8750261

Dean of Student Affairs
Phone: (+234) 8023291617, (+234) 8054848778

Vice Chancellor
Phone: (+234) 8033299153

Please also copy:

OAU STUDENTS HOLD ANOTHER INVIGORATING SYMPOSIUM


AGREED TO A CONGRESS ON 12TH APRIL TO FORM ELECTORAL AND ELECTIONS PETITION COMMITTEES

NO GOING BACK ON CONDUCT OF ELECTIONS THIS SEMESTER!

It was another thought-provoking session on April 3, 2013 at a public symposium organized by the Students' Union Transition Committee (SUTC) at the Obafemi Awolowo University(OAU) at Ile-Ife. The symposium discussed the theme, "banning and unbanning of the OAU Students' Union; lessons from the past and a journey into the future", as a way of finding the solution to the continual proscription of OAU students' union.
Seasoned workers' and youth activists (who were also ex-students' union leaders), like H.T Soweto (Member of the Democratic Socialist Movement and National Coordinator of the Education Rights Campaign, ERC), Kunle Ajayi (Wiseman), Olorunwa Emmanuel (Goddey), Tobi Sofowora and others, took turns to discuss this topic with Great Ife students.

While giving the lead discussion, H.T. Soweto disapproved of the long stay of members of the Transition Committee and called for an immediate congress to form electoral and elections petition committees. The tumultuous applause that accompanied Soweto's speech reflected the unanimous support his position gained from the over 200 students present at the symposium. Similarly, other speakers took turn to charge students on the need to continually mount pressure on the SUTC to set up an electoral commission in a congress. The SUTC was also advised not to elongate its stay out of sheer opportunism or treacherous loyalty to the university administration, but to follow the popular demand of students for an elected union.

The response by students during the 'questions and comments' session of the symposium reflects frustration and anger. Allegations of opportunism, crookedness and insincerity of purpose were leveled against the SUTC by students who spoke during this session. While answering and reacting to the questions and comments, Soweto asked the SUTC to categorically state at the symposium when a congress will be called to discuss the formation of electioneering committees as earlier agreed. The Chairman of the SUTC, AY Toes, while stating the committee's position on congress announced that a congress of students would be convened at Amphi Theatre on Friday, April 12 by 8am. 

Students supported this SUTC proclamation, but however still expressed doubts about the sincerity of the announcement. To avoid the SUTC backing off on the arrangement, students demanded that an adhoc committee be formed to take up aggressive mobilization for the congress whether the SUTC participates or not. Consequently, a five person committee was formed to take up the mobilization for the congress.

The DSM and ERC OAU Chapters played a significant role in organizing the symposium. Indeed it was the 9-day ultimatum issued by the ERC which forced the SUTC to organize the symposium instead of the demanded congress. Even when the symposium was announced, the DSM and ERC with other left organisations jointly mobilized students to the SUTC symposium. The result of our mobilization is indeed the far-reaching decisions reached at the symposium. 

Procession for Chavez
In our view, concrete progress is being made in the struggle for students' union restoration. At the end of the symposium, students honoured the memory of the late Venezuelan president, Hugo Chavez, with a candlelit procession. This was in response to the call of the DSM members. The essence of this program was to draw appropriate lessons from the political situation of Venezuela and as well proffer the way forward for the working and poor people of Venezuela as well as the next step for the Bolivarian revolution.

After a small procession which took off from Anglo-Moz car park and ended at the Students' Union Building (SUB) where there were discussions and debates on the political situation in Venezuela and the important lessons to be drawn in relation to Nigeria. While some referred to Venezuelan economy as "Socialist" making reference to many of its populist policies and reforms in the education, health as well as the nationalization of some parts of the economy, we, while acknowledging these achievements, argued that this not yet genuine socialism. Certain key sectors of the economy still remain in the hands of capitalists and most of the very positive reforms carried out under Chavez were carried out with a top-down approach in such a way that the Venezuelan working masses were shut out. This has in turn led to big contradictions in the form of a corrupt layer (the boli-bourgeoisie) developing on the back of Chavez movement thus creating widespread discontent among the workers and poor masses. 

While Chavez's popularity among the masses was never in doubt until his death, this cannot be said for other members of the state bureaucracy and Chavez movement most of whom are widely hated and could only win elections by hiding behind Chavez's appeal among the masses. This is what explains the growing support in recent elections for the counter-revolutionary right. In reality, Venezuela is at a cross-road between capitalism and genuine socialism. The fate of the Bolivarian revolution and that of the important social reforms already achieved are at risk now that Chavez is dead more than ever. We argued for a complete break with capitalism and a rounded-out revolutionary socialist programme as the only way to fully consummate the Bolivarian revolution in Venezuela. This will require a bottom-top democratic control and management of the economy and decision-making by the working masses themselves

It is significant to note that millions of Venezuelans trooped out to mourn the death of Hugo Chavez. This cannot be detached from the aforementioned policies of the regime which meant a great difference for the working masses. It also reflects the huge prospects of organising society in a democratic socialist order. It however also shows the dire need to improve on this with the total nationalization of the commanding heights of the Venezuelan economy and the democratic control and management by the working and poor people of Venezuela.

The programme ended with comrades urging the participants to join the Socialist Party of Nigeria (SPN) as a step towards building a mass based working people's alternative to the existing capitalist political parties that are incapable of implementing pro-people's policies such as free education, free health care, decent jobs, etc.

Wole Olubanji
Secretary, ERC OAU

Wednesday, 3 April 2013

NEWS FLASH !!! June 16 Day of Action: Info Needed


Hello everyone! The Education Rights Campaign (ERC) has renewed its campaign against education underfunding, attack on democratic rights and fee hike. Last year we had a day of action on October 1st 2012 with impressive turnout at the University of Ibadan (U.I) and a few other places. This year we want to succeed far more in telling the government a big NO TO ALL ANTI-POOR EDUCATION POLICIES! 

So we are mobilising towards a new day of action on June 16, 2013. This will involve lecture boycotts and mass protests on campuses and on the streets to call government's attention to the deplorable condition of public education and the need to use our collective wealth to fund education adequately.

However we need the help of everyone now. We want to collate a comprehensive list of cases of current hike in school fees, cases of suspension, expulsion, rustication and arrest/detention of students and staff union activists, cases of ban of independent unionism etc on campuses and in schools. We want to gather all these together over the next two weeks in other to make a strong case to back up this campaign. 

So if you are from a school where fees have been recently hiked or union leaders/activists victimised or your union has been banned, please write to edurightsforall@yahoo.co.uk or leave a comment under this post. Please include the name of the school, the full names of those involved if it is a case of victimisation you are reporting, as well as other factual details that can help us verify the veracity of your information. If it is a case of fee hike, we will like detailed information about the previous fee regime and the new hike as well as any other valuable details.

Don't forget to also drop your phone number and E-mail address through which we can contact you if need be. You can also call 07033697259 if you would like to help the campaign in any other way.

Thanks!

Free and functional education is a right! Not Privilege!!